nGPz content - New Engine Design
dwaynedaniels at sbcglobal.net
Sun Mar 29 17:21:48 PDT 2009
Details, details. If they do there dilligence, this could be a very good design.
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, schnowz <schnowz at att.net> wrote:
From: schnowz <schnowz at att.net>
Subject: RE: nGPz content - New Engine Design
To: gpzlist at micapeak.com
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 2:52 PM
Interesting, though the claim of 3 moving parts is a exaggeration. I see 2
caps 4 pistons and 4 balls.
The hardest part of any new idea is the implementation.
I remember Mazda had mucho problems witht the seals on there rotary engines
initially, and this looks like it would be more difficult - especially as it
wears. With a conventional engine the rings can expand to accommodate some of
Still nothing ventured - nothing gained..
More information about the GPZList