rearset adjustment preference?

Ernest Montague afm199 at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 16 12:30:54 PST 2008


I don't drag pegs with my setup.  the svs is .75 higher than the naked.

Is your sag/spring rate correct?  I have run 1.5 up and back, just hard  
on my knees. Actually it is the up that is hard, the back is easier.


On Feb 16, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Erik Weber wrote:

> Are you asking which people would like better, holes or sliders? I've
> never tried the slider type so I couldn't say.
>
> 2.5 inches up and back from the stock *naked* position doesn't seem
> like that much to me, I'm a little surprised by what Ernie said. I
> think that's 1.5 inches up and back from stock "S" position, right? I
> would use every bit of that. I already use 1.0 inches up and back from
> stock "S" position, my rear ride height is up, what, 1.5 inches or so
> with the Penske and I still drag pegs before using all of the rear
> tire (it's pretty close though). So it seems one more half inch in
> either direction is not absurd. Hope I've got my numbers right.
>
> What also is important to me is choice of pegs. I like aftermarket
> pegs that are still mounted with the OEM spring returns. I like being
> able to drag the pegs just a tad without worrying about it.
>
> I don't think I'm a typical customer so you should solicit more  
> opinions. :)
>
> Erik
>
>
> On 2/15/08, matthew patton <pattonme at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> which do you folks prefer in a rearset?
>>
>> infinate adjustability from stock SV-N to a little over 2.5" back and
>> 2.5 up vs adjustable range from stock SV-N raised 15mm to 2.5" back  
>> and
>> 2mm shy of 2" up?
>>
>> I just wondered which had more appeal.
>>
>>
>>
>>       
>> ______________________________________________________________________ 
>> ______________
>> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
>> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>>
>



More information about the SV650 mailing list